Paper detail

Study of in-medium $η^\prime$ properties in the ($γ$, ${η^\prime}p$) reaction on nuclei

We study the near-threshold photoproduction of $η^\prime$ mesons from nuclei in coincidence with forward going protons in the kinematical conditions of the Crystal Barrel/TAPS experiment, recently performed at ELSA. The calculations have been performed within a collision model based on the nuclear spectral function. The model accounts for both the primary $γp \to {η^\prime}p$ process and the two-step intermediate nucleon rescattering processes as well as the effect of the nuclear $η^\prime$ mean-field potential. We calculate the exclusive $η^\prime$ kinetic energy distributions for the $^{12}$C($γ$, ${η^\prime}p$) reaction for different scenarios of $η^\prime$ in-medium modification. We find that the considered two-step rescattering mechanism plays an insignificant role in ${η^\prime}p$ photoproduction off the carbon target. We also demonstrate that the calculated $η^\prime$ kinetic energy distributions in primary photon--proton ${η^\prime}p$ production reveal strong sensitivity to the depth of the real ${η^\prime}$ potential at normal nuclear matter density (or to the ${η^\prime}$ in-medium mass shift) in the studied incident photon energy regime. Therefore, such observables may be useful to help determine the above ${η^\prime}$ in-medium renormalization from the comparison of the results of our calculations with the data from the CBELSA/TAPS experiment. In addition, we show that these distributions are also strongly influenced by the momentum-dependent optical potential, which the outgoing participant proton feels inside the carbon nucleus. This potential should be taken into account in the analysis of these data with the aim to obtain information on the ${η^\prime}$ modification in cold nuclear matter.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.