Paper detail

Study of impurity distribution in mechanically polished, chemically treated and high vacuum degassed pure Niobium samples using TOFSIMS technique

The performance of Superconducting radio frequency cavities (SRF) is strongly influenced by various impurities within the penetration depth (~50nm) of Nb, which in turn depends on the applied surface treatments. The effect of these surface treatments on the impurities of Nb has been explored using various surface analytical treatments. But, the results are still inadequate in many aspects and the effect of sequential SRF treatments on the impurity distribution has not been explored. The present study analyses various impurities within the penetration depth of Nb samples, treated by SRF cavity processing techniques like colloidal silica polishing (simulating centrifugal barrel polishing), buffer chemical polishing (BCP), high pressure rinsing (HPR) and degassing under high vacuum (HV) condition at 600°C for 10hrs. Static, dynamic and slow sputtering modes of Time of flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (TOFSIMS) technique was employed to study the effect of the above treatments on interstitial impurities, hydrocarbons, oxides, acidic residuals, reaction products and metallic contaminations. The study confirms that the impurity distribution in Nb is not only sensitive to the surface treatment, but also to their sequence. Varying the treatment sequence prior to HV degassing treatments affected the final impurity levels in HV degassed bulk Nb samples. BCP treated samples, exhibited minimum hydrocarbon and metallic contamination but, led to extensive contamination of the oxide layer with residuals and reaction products of acids used in BCP solution. HPR treatment, on the other hand was effective in reducing the acidic impurities on the top surface. The study also establishes the application of TOFSIMS technique to analyze and evolve SRF treatments.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.