Paper detail

Study of Electric Quadrupole Perturbation at Multiple Probe Sites in Hf-doped Rutile in a Single Perturbed γ-γ Angular Correlation Measurement

Two different probes, viz., 111In/111Cd and 181Hf/181Ta, simultaneously have been incorporated in both pure rutile and Hafnium (Hf) -doped rutile Titanium Dioxide (TiO2) systems following a soft chemical method. The local information around two different probe sites in the same sample could be extracted in a single Time Differential Perturbed Angular Correlation (TDPAC) measurement using LIST mode data acquisition. The two probes were incorporated in the rutile samples by co-precipitation technique and then annealed at 1273K for 10h to get the rutile structure. The rutile structure was identified by the hyperfine parameters, viz., quadrupole frequency (ωQ) and asymmetry (eta). At 111Cd site, ωQ=16.8(1) Mrad/s and eta=0.19(1) while at 181Ta site, ωQ=127.2(2) Mrad/s and eta=0.56(1). Due to the doping of Hf at 5 and 10 atom%, the sample partially lost the purity of the crystal and the fact has been reflected at both the probe sites.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.