Paper detail

Study of $\bar{B}_s\to K^{(*)}\ell^+ \ell^-$ decays in the PQCD factorization approach with the lattice QCD input

In this paper, we studied systematically the semileptonic decays $\bar{B}_s \to K^{(*)} \ell^+ \ell^-$ with $l^-=(e^-,μ^-,τ^-)$ by using the perturbative QCD (PQCD) and the "PQCD+Lattice" factorization approach, respectively. We first evaluated all relevant form factors $F_i(q^2)$ in the low $q^2$ region using the PQCD approach, and we also take the available Lattice QCD results at the end point $q^2_{max}$ as additional inputs to improve the extrapolation of the form factors to the high $q^2$ region. We calculated the branching ratios and other twelve kinds of physical observables. From our studies, we find the following points: (a) for $ \bar{B}_s \to K l^+ l^-$ decays, the PQCD and "PQCD+Lattice" predictions for branching ratios (BRs) ${\cal B}(\bar{B}_s \to K l^+ l^-)$, the ratios of the BRs $R_K^{eμ}$ and $R_K^{μτ}$, and the longitudinal polarization asymmetry of the leptons $P_L$ agree well within errors; (b) the PQCD and "PQCD+Lattice" predictions for the CP averaged branching ratio ${\cal B}(\bar{B}_s \to K^* μ^+ μ^-)$ are $(3.17^{+0.95}_{-0.78})\times 10^{-8}$ and $(2.48^{+0.56}_{-0.50})\times 10^{-8}$ respectively, which agree well with the LHCb measured value $(2.9\pm 1.1) \times 10^{-8}$ and the light-cone sum rule (LCSR) prediction; (c) for the ratios $R_{K^\ast}^{eμ}$ and $R_{K^\ast}^{μτ}$, the PQCD and "PQCD+Lattice" predictions agree well with each other and have a small error less than $10\%$; (d) for the direct CP asymmetries ${\cal A}_{CP}$ of all considered decay modes, they are always very small as expected: less than $5\%$ in magnitude; and (e) for the angular observables $P_{1,2,3}$ and $P^\prime_{4,5,6,8}$ , our theoretical predictions for each kind of lepton are consistent within errors. We believe that above predictions could be tested by future LHCb and Belle-II experiments.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.