Paper detail

Structuring Relevant Feature Sets with Multiple Model Learning

Feature selection is one of the most prominent learning tasks, especially in high-dimensional datasets in which the goal is to understand the mechanisms that underly the learning dataset. However most of them typically deliver just a flat set of relevant features and provide no further information on what kind of structures, e.g. feature groupings, might underly the set of relevant features. In this paper we propose a new learning paradigm in which our goal is to uncover the structures that underly the set of relevant features for a given learning problem. We uncover two types of features sets, non-replaceable features that contain important information about the target variable and cannot be replaced by other features, and functionally similar features sets that can be used interchangeably in learned models, given the presence of the non-replaceable features, with no change in the predictive performance. To do so we propose a new learning algorithm that learns a number of disjoint models using a model disjointness regularization constraint together with a constraint on the predictive agreement of the disjoint models. We explore the behavior of our approach on a number of high-dimensional datasets, and show that, as expected by their construction, these satisfy a number of properties. Namely, model disjointness, a high predictive agreement, and a similar predictive performance to models learned on the full set of relevant features. The ability to structure the set of relevant features in such a manner can become a valuable tool in different applications of scientific knowledge discovery.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.