Paper detail

Structure, non-stoichiometry, and geometrical frustration of alpha-tetragonal boron

Recent discoveries of supposedly pure alpha-tetragonal boron require to revisit its structure. The system is also interesting with respect to a new type of geometrical frustration in elemental crystals, which was found in beta-rhombohedral boron. Based on density functional theory calculations, the present study has resolved the structural and thermodynamic characteristics of pure alpha-tetragonal boron. Different from beta-rhombohedral boron, the conditions for stable covalent bonding (a band gap and completely filled valence bands) are almost fulfilled at a composition B_52 with two 4c interstitial sites occupied. This indicates that the ground state of pure alpha-tetragonal boron is stoichiometric. However, the covalent condition is not perfectly fulfilled because non-bonding in-gap states exist that cannot be eliminated. The half occupation of the 4c sites yields a macroscopic amount of residual entropy, which is as large as that of beta-rhombohedral boron. Therefore, alpha-tetragonal boron can be classified as an elemental crystal with geometrical frustration. Deviations from stoichiometry can occur only at finite temperatures. Thermodynamic considerations show that deviations delta from the stoichiometric composition B_(52+delta) are small and positive. For reported high-pressure syntheses conditions delta is predicted to be about 0.1 to 0.2. An important difference between pure and C- or N-containing alpha-tetragonal boron is found in the occupation of interstitial sites: the pure form prefers to occupy the 4c sites, whereas in C- or N-containing forms a mixture of 2a, 8h, and 8i sites are occupied. The present article provides relations of site occupation, delta values, and lattice parameters, which enable us to identify pure alpha-tetragonal and distinguish the pure form from other ones.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.

Structure, non-stoichiometry, and geometrical frustration of alpha-tetragonal boron | BZPEER | BZPEER