Paper detail

Structure effects on the giant monopole resonance and determinations of the nuclear incompressibility

Giant resonances are collective nuclear vibrations which provide a unique laboratory setting to probe the bulk properties of the nuclear force. One of the isoscalar compressional modes -- the isoscalar giant monopole resonance (ISGMR) -- is useful in constraining the equation of state (EoS) of nuclear matter. For example, the nuclear incompressibility, $K_\infty$, is a fundamental quantity in the EoS and is directly correlated with the energies of the ISGMR in finite nuclei. Previous work has shown that interactions with $K_\infty$ which reproduce the energies of the ISGMR in $^{208}$Pb and $^{90}$Zr well, overestimate those of the tin and cadmium nuclei. To further investigate where this "softness" appears in moving away from the doubly-closed nucleus $^{90}$Zr, and how this effect develops, the first portion of this thesis consists of measurements of the ISGMR in the molybdenum isotopes. Comparison of the ISGMR strengths with Random Phase Approximation calculations shows that these nuclei have ISGMR energies which are overestimated to a similar degree as seen in the tin and cadmium nuclei, while the strength of $^{208}$Pb is precisely reproduced. This suggests clearly that the molybdenum nuclei exhibit the same open-shell softness which has been documented previously. The ISGMR in isotopes encompassing a broad range of proton-neutron asymmetries constrains the dependence of the nuclear incompressibility on the isospin asymmetry, as quantified by the asymmetry term, $K_τ$. To reconcile previously-published and highly concerning conclusions that $K_τ= + 582$ MeV, the second portion of this thesis is focused upon independently studying this claim. A simultaneous measurement of the ISGMR in $^{40,42,44,48}$Ca has excluded the possibility of a positive value for $K_τ$, and found consistency with previous data, placing $K_τ$ at $-510 \pm 115$ MeV.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.