Paper detail

Structural and Magnetic Reconstruction of Thermodynamically Stable CaMnO$_{3}$ (001) Surfaces

The relative thermodynamic stability of surface reconstructions including vacancies, adatoms and additional layers on both CaO and MnO$_{2}$ terminations is calculated to predict the surface phase diagram of ($\sqrt{2}\times\sqrt{2}$)$\it{R}$45$^{\circ}$ CaMnO$_{3}$ (001) using $\it{ab}$ $\it{initio}$ thermodynamics. Stoichiometric and nonstoichiometric reconstructions are considered. A set of boundary conditions driven by the binary and ternary sub-phases from CaMnO$_{3}$ defines its bulk stability region, enclosing the stable surface reconstructions that can be in equilibrium with the bulk. Most of the surfaces take the magnetic ordering of the bulk ground state, G-type antiferromagnetic (AFM); however, some of the MnO$_{2}$-terminated surfaces are more stable when the surface layer spins flip. At 573 K, the stoichiometric CaO- and MnO$_{2}$-terminated surfaces are predicted to be thermodynamically stable, as well as a CaO-terminated surface reconstruction where half the Ca are replaced by Mn. The MnO$_{2}$-terminated surface reconstructions dominate the phase diagrams at high temperatures, including phases with MnO and MnO$_{2}$ adatoms per surface unit cell.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.