Paper detail

Strongly correlated superconductivity

Band theory and BCS theory are arguably the most successful theories of condensed matter physics. Yet, in a number of materials, in particular the high-temperature superconductors and the layered organic superconductors, they fail. In these lecture notes for an international school, I emphasize that even though the low energy properties of a phase of matter are generally emergent and entirely determined by the broken symmetry, there are many differences between a strongly correlated and a weakly correlated state of matter. For example, spin waves are an emergent property for antiferromagnets, but for weak correlations the normal phase of a (Slater) antiferromagnet is metallic, whereas it is insulating (Heisenberg) for strong correlations. As a function of interaction strength, above the antiferromagnetic phase, the crossover between a metal and a local moment paramagnetic insulator is described by the Mott transition, whose mean-field theory down to T=0 is best formulated with dynamical mean-field theory. A similar situation occurs for superconductors: despite similar emergent properties, there are many differences between both kinds of superconductors. Experimental evidence suggests that hole-doped cuprates are strongly correlated whereas the correlations are weaker in the electron-doped case, especially near optimal doping. Evidence for a pseudogap arising from antiferromagnetic fluctuations is strong in the latter case, whereas in the hole-doped case the pseudogap temperature appears as a consequence of Mott physics. In cluster dynamical mean-field theory, the pseudogap line T* is a Widom line arising from a T=0 first-order transition that terminates at a finite T critical point. Strongly correlated superconductors are much more resilient to near-neighbor repulsion than their weakly correlated counterpart. Many different methods to attack these problems theoretically are described.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.