Paper detail

Strong polygamy of multi-party $q$-expected quantum correlations

We show that the polygamous nature of multi-party quantum correlations can be characterized in a {\em stronger} form based on Tsallis $q$-entropy and $q$-expectation value. By considering the amount of entanglement that can be distributed in multi-party systems, we establish a class of strong polygamy inequalities of multi-party entanglement in terms of Tsallis $q$-entropy and $q$-expectation for $q \geq 1$. Our new class of inequalities is in fact tighter than the usual polygamy inequalities of multi-party entanglement, and the tightness is explicitly illustrated by an example. Moreover, our new class of inequalities is concerned with the $q$-expected entanglement distributed between a single party and any possible subsets of the rest parties whereas the usual polygamy inequality only considers the entanglement between a single party and another. We further establish the equivalence between strong polygamy inequalities of quantum entanglement and quantum discord distributed in multi-party quantum systems.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.