Paper detail

Strong consistency of the AIC, BIC, $C_p$ and KOO methods in high-dimensional multivariate linear regression

Variable selection is essential for improving inference and interpretation in multivariate linear regression. Although a number of alternative regressor selection criteria have been suggested, the most prominent and widely used are the Akaike information criterion (AIC), Bayesian information criterion (BIC), Mallow's $C_p$, and their modifications. However, for high-dimensional data, experience has shown that the performance of these classical criteria is not always satisfactory. In the present article, we begin by presenting the necessary and sufficient conditions (NSC) for the strong consistency of the high-dimensional AIC, BIC, and $C_p$, based on which we can identify some reasons for their poor performance. Specifically, we show that under certain mild high-dimensional conditions, if the BIC is strongly consistent, then the AIC is strongly consistent, but not vice versa. This result contradicts the classical understanding. In addition, we consider some NSC for the strong consistency of the high-dimensional kick-one-out (KOO) methods introduced by Zhao et al. (1986) and Nishii et al. (1988). Furthermore, we propose two general methods based on the KOO methods and prove their strong consistency. The proposed general methods remove the penalties while simultaneously reducing the conditions for the dimensions and sizes of the regressors. A simulation study supports our consistency conclusions and shows that the convergence rates of the two proposed general KOO methods are much faster than those of the original methods.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.