Paper detail

Strong conciseness in profinite groups

A group word $w$ is said to be strongly concise in a class $\mathcal{C}$ of profinite groups if, for every group $G$ in $\mathcal{C}$ such that $w$ takes less than $2^{\aleph_0}$ values in $G$, the verbal subgroup $w(G)$ is finite. Detomi, Morigi and Shumyatsky established that multilinear commutator words -- and the particular words $x^2$ and $[x^2,y]$ -- have the property that the corresponding verbal subgroup is finite in a profinite group $G$ whenever the word takes at most countably many values in $G$. They conjectured that, in fact, this should be true for every word. In particular, their conjecture included as open cases power words and Engel words. In the present paper, we take a new approach via parametrised words that leads to stronger results. First we prove that multilinear commutator words are strongly concise in the class of all profinite groups. Then we establish that every group word is strongly concise in the class of nilpotent profinite groups. From this we deduce, for instance, that, if $w$ is one of the group words $x^2$, $x^3$, $x^6$, $[x^3,y]$ or $[x,y,y]$, then $w$ is strongly concise in the class of all profinite groups. Indeed, the same conclusion can be reached for all words of the infinite families $[x^m,z_1,\ldots,z_r]$ and $[x,y,y,z_1,\ldots,z_r]$, where $m \in \{2,3\}$ and $r \ge 1$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.