Paper detail

Stretching and folding diagnostics in solutions of the three-dimensional Euler and Navier-Stokes equations

Two possible diagnostics of stretching and folding (S&F) in fluid flows are discussed, based on the dynamics of the gradient of potential vorticity ($q = \bom\cdot\nablaθ$) associated with solutions of the three-dimensional Euler and Navier-Stokes equations. The vector $\bdB = \nabla q \times \nablaθ$ satisfies the same type of stretching and folding equation as that for the vorticity field $\bom $ in the incompressible Euler equations (Gibbon & Holm, 2010). The quantity $θ$ may be chosen as the potential temperature for the stratified, rotating Euler/Navier-Stokes equations, or it may play the role of a seeded passive scalar for the Euler equations alone. The first discussion of these S&F-flow diagnostics concerns a numerical test for Euler codes and also includes a connection with the two-dimensional surface quasi-geostrophic equations. The second S&F-flow diagnostic concerns the evolution of the Lamb vector $\bsD = \bom\times\bu$, which is the nonlinearity for Euler's equations apart from the pressure. The curl of the Lamb vector ($\boldsymbol{\varpi} := \bsD$) turns out to possess similar stretching and folding properties to that of the $\bdB$-vector.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.