Paper detail

Straightening Out the Frobenius-Schur Indicator

The Frobenius-Schur indicator is a parameter $κ_a=\pm 1$ assigned to each self-dual particle $a$ in a TQFT. If $κ_a$ is negative then straightening out a timelike zig-zag in the worldline of a particle of type $a$ can incur a minus sign and in this case the amplitude associated with the diagram is not invariant under deformation. This has caused some confusion about the topological invariance of even simple theories to space-time deformations. We clarify that, given a TQFT with negative Frobenius-Schur indicators, there are two distinct conventions commonly used to interpret a spacetime diagram as a physical amplitude, only one of which is isotopy invariant. We clarify in what sense TQFTs based on Chern-Simons theory with negative Frobenius-Schur indicators are isotopy invariant, and we explain how the Frobenius-Schur indicator is intimately linked with the need to frame world-lines in Chern-Simons theory. Further, in the non-isotopy-invariant interpretation of the diagram algebra we show how a trick of bookkeeping can usually be invoked to push minus signs onto the diagrammatic value of a loop (the "loop weight"), such that most of the evaluation of a diagram does not incur minus signs from straightening zig-zags, and only at the last step minus signs are added. We explain the conditions required for this to be possible. We then further examine what is required in order for a theory to have full isotopy invariance of planar spacetime diagrams, and discover that, if we have successfully pushed the signs from zig-zags onto the loop weight, the only possible obstruction to this is given by an object related to vertices, known as the "third Frobenius-Schur indicator". We finally discuss the extent to which this gives us full isotopy invariance for braided theories.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.