Paper detail

Storing, preprocessing and analyzing Tweets: Finding the suitable NoSQL system

NoSQL systems are a new generation of databases that aim to handle a large volume of data. However there is a large set of NoSQL systems, each has its own characteristics. Consequently choosing the suitable NoSQL system to handle Tweets is challenging. Based on these motivations, this work is carried out to find the suitable NoSQL system to store, preprocess and analyze Tweets. This paper presents the requirements of managing Tweets and provides a detailed comparison of five of the most popular NoSQL systems namely, Redis, Cassandra, MongoDB, Couchbase and Neo4j regarding to these requirements. The results of this work show that for Tweets storing, preprocessing and analyzing, MongoDB and Couchbase are the most suitable NoSQL systems. Unlike related works, this work compares five NoSQL systems from different types in a real scenario which is Tweet storing, preprocessing and analyzing. The chosen scenario enables to evaluate not only the performance of read and write operations, but also other requirements related to Tweets management such as scalability, analysis tools support and analysis languages support.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.