Paper detail

Storing Cycles in Hopfield-type Networks with Pseudoinverse Learning Rule - Retrievability and Bifurcation Analysis

In this paper, we study retrievability of admissible cycles and the dynamics of the networks constructed from admissible cycles with the pseudoinverse learning rule. Retrievability of admissible cycles in networks with $C_0>0$ and $λ$ sufficiently large are discussed. Based on the linear stability analysis we derive a complete description of all possible local bifurcations of the trivial solution for the networks constructed from admissible cycles. We illustrate numerically that, depending on the structural features, the admissible cycles are respectively stored and retrieved as attracting limit cycles, unstable periodic solutions and delay-induced long-lasting transient oscillations, and the transition from fixed points to the attracting limit cycle bifurcating from the trivial solution takes place through multiple saddle-nodes on limit cycle bifurcations.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.