Paper detail

STOMP: A Tool for Evaluation of Scheduling Policies in Heterogeneous Multi-Processors

The proliferation of heterogeneous chip multiprocessors in recent years has reached unprecedented levels. Traditional homogeneous platforms have shown fundamental limitations when it comes to enabling high-performance yet-ultra-low-power computing, in particular in application domains with real-time execution deadlines or criticality constraints. By combining the right set of general purpose cores and hardware accelerators together, along with proper chip interconnects and memory technology, heterogeneous chip multiprocessors have become an effective high-performance and low-power computing alternative. One of the challenges of heterogeneous architectures relates to efficient scheduling of application tasks (processes, threads) across the variety of options in the chip. As a result, it is key to provide tools to enable early-stage prototyping and evaluation of new scheduling policies for heterogeneous platforms. In this paper, we present STOMP (Scheduling Techniques Optimization in heterogeneous Multi-Processors), a simulator for fast implementation and evaluation of task scheduling policies in multi-core/multi-processor systems with a convenient interface for "plugging" in new scheduling policies in a simple manner. Thorough validation of STOMP exhibits small relative errors when compared against closed-formed equivalent models during steady-state analysis.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.