Paper detail

Stiff-spring approximation revisited: inertial effects in non-equilibrium trajectories

Use of harmonic guiding potentials is the most common method for implementing steered molecular dynamics (SMD) simulations, performed to obtain potentials of mean force (PMFs) of molecular systems using non-equilibrium work (NEW) theorems. Harmonic guiding potentials are also the natural choice in single molecule force spectroscopy experiments. The stiff spring approximation (SSA) of Schulten and coworkers enables to use the work performed along SMD trajectories to obtain the PMF. We discuss and demonstrate how a high spring constant, k, required for the validity of the SSA can violate another requirement of this theory, i.e., the validity of Brownian dynamics of the system. Violation of the Brownian condition results in the introduction of kinetic energy contributions to the external work, performed during SMD simulations. These inertial effects result in skewed work distributions, rather than the Gaussian distributions predicted by SSA. The inertial effects also result in broader work distributions, which worsen the effect of the skewness when calculating work averages. Remarkably, our results strongly suggest that the skew and width of work distributions are independent of the average drift velocity and physical asymmetries. The skew and broadening of work distributions result in biased estimation of the PMF. The bias manifests itself in the form of a systematic error that increases with simulation time. We discuss the proper upper limit for k, such that the inertial effects are avoided. This limit, used together with the relation for the lower limit of k, enables to conduct accurate steering while satisfying the Brownian dynamics. Furthermore, we argue and demonstrate that using the peak-value (rather than the statistical mean) of the work distributions vastly reduces the bias in the calculated PMFs and improves the accuracy.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.