Paper detail

Stellar coronal X-ray emission and surface magnetic flux

Observations show that the coronal X-ray emission of the Sun and other stars depends on the surface magnetic field. Using power-law scaling relations between different physical parameters, we build an analytical model to connect the observed X-ray emission to the magnetic flux. The basis for our model are the scaling laws of Rosner, Tucker \& Vaiana (RTV) that connect the temperature and pressure of a coronal loop to its length and energy input. To estimate the energy flux into the upper atmosphere, we use scalings derived for different heating mechanisms, e.g. for field-line braiding or Alfven-wave heating. We supplement this by observed relations between active region size and magnetic flux and derive scalings of how X-ray emissivity depends on temperature. Based on our analytical model, we find a power-law dependence of the X-ray emission on the magnetic flux, $L_{\rm X}\propto Φ^m$, with a power-law index $m$ being in the range from about 1 to 2. This finding is consistent with a wide range of observations, from individual features on the Sun, e.g. bright points or active regions, to stars of different types and varying levels of activity. The power-law index $m$ depends on the choice of the heating mechanism, and our results slightly favour the braiding and nanoflare scenarios over Alfvén wave heating. In addition, the choice of instrument will have an impact on the power-law index $m$, which is because of the sensitivity of the observed wavelength region to the temperature of the coronal plasma. Overall, our simple analytical model based on the RTV scaling laws gives a good representation of the observed X-ray emission. This underlines that we might be able to understand stellar coronal activity though a collection of basic building blocks, i.e. loops, that we can study in spatially resolved detail on the Sun.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.