BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

J. Warnecke

J. Warnecke contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.SRastro-ph.COastro-ph.IMphysics.flu-dyn

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Hunting down the cause of solar magnetism

To understand solar and stellar dynamos combining local and global numerical modelling with long-term observations is a challenging task: even with state of the art computational methods and resources, the stellar parameter regime remains unattainable. Our goal is to relax some approximations, in order to simulate more realistic systems, and try to connect the results with theoretical predictions and state-of-the-art observations. We present here the first test-field measurements from our higher-resolution runs with improved heat conduction description. They indicate significant changes in the profiles of the most crucial inductive effect related to solar and stellar dynamo mechanisms. Higher resolution runs, currently undertaken, will bring us into an even more turbulent regime, in which we will be able to study, for the first time, the interaction of small- and large-scale dynamos in a quantitative way.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Shapes of stellar activity cycles

Magnetic activity cycles are an important phenomenon in both the Sun and other stars. The shape of the solar cycle is commonly characterised by a fast rise and a slower decline, but not much attention has been paid to the shape of cycles in other stars. Our aim is to study whether the asymmetric shape of the solar cycle is common in other stars as well, and compare the cycle asymmetry to other stellar parameters. We also study the differences in the shape of the solar cycle, depending on what activity indicator is used. The observations are also compared to simulated activity cycles. We use the chromospheric Ca II H&K data from the Mount Wilson Observatory HK Project. From this data set we identify 47 individual cycles from 18 stars. We use the statistical skewness of a cycle as a measure of its asymmetry, and compare this to other stellar parameters. A similar analysis has been done to magnetic cycles extracted from direct numerical magnetohydrodynamic simulations of solar-type convection zones. The shape of the solar cycle (fast rise and slower decline) is common in other stars as well, although the Sun has particularly asymmetric cycles. Cycle-to-cycle variations are large, but the average shape of a cycle is still fairly well represented by a sinusoid. We find only slight correlations between the cycle asymmetry and other stellar parameters. There are large differences in the shape of the solar cycle, depending on what activity indicator is used. In the simulated cycles, there is a difference in the symmetry of global simulations covering the full longitudinal range, hence capable of exciting non-axisymmetric dynamo modes, versus wedge simulations covering a partial extent in longitude, where only axisymmetric modes are possible. The former produce preferentially positive skewness, while the latter a negative one.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Stellar coronal X-ray emission and surface magnetic flux

Observations show that the coronal X-ray emission of the Sun and other stars depends on the surface magnetic field. Using power-law scaling relations between different physical parameters, we build an analytical model to connect the observed X-ray emission to the magnetic flux. The basis for our model are the scaling laws of Rosner, Tucker \& Vaiana (RTV) that connect the temperature and pressure of a coronal loop to its length and energy input. To estimate the energy flux into the upper atmosphere, we use scalings derived for different heating mechanisms, e.g. for field-line braiding or Alfven-wave heating. We supplement this by observed relations between active region size and magnetic flux and derive scalings of how X-ray emissivity depends on temperature. Based on our analytical model, we find a power-law dependence of the X-ray emission on the magnetic flux, $L_{\rm X}\propto Φ^m$, with a power-law index $m$ being in the range from about 1 to 2. This finding is consistent with a wide range of observations, from individual features on the Sun, e.g. bright points or active regions, to stars of different types and varying levels of activity. The power-law index $m$ depends on the choice of the heating mechanism, and our results slightly favour the braiding and nanoflare scenarios over Alfvén wave heating. In addition, the choice of instrument will have an impact on the power-law index $m$, which is because of the sensitivity of the observed wavelength region to the temperature of the coronal plasma. Overall, our simple analytical model based on the RTV scaling laws gives a good representation of the observed X-ray emission. This underlines that we might be able to understand stellar coronal activity though a collection of basic building blocks, i.e. loops, that we can study in spatially resolved detail on the Sun.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

The Pencil Code, a modular MPI code for partial differential equations and particles: multipurpose and multiuser-maintained

The Pencil Code is a highly modular physics-oriented simulation code that can be adapted to a wide range of applications. It is primarily designed to solve partial differential equations (PDEs) of compressible hydrodynamics and has lots of add-ons ranging from astrophysical magnetohydrodynamics (MHD) to meteorological cloud microphysics and engineering applications in combustion. Nevertheless, the framework is general and can also be applied to situations not related to hydrodynamics or even PDEs, for example when just the message passing interface or input/output strategies of the code are to be used. The code can also evolve Lagrangian (inertial and noninertial) particles, their coagulation and condensation, as well as their interaction with the fluid.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access