Paper detail

Statistics of extremes in eigenvalue-counting staircases

We consider the number ${\cal N}_{θ_A}(θ)$ of eigenvalues $e^{i θ_j}$ of a random unitary matrix, drawn from CUE$_β(N)$, in the interval $θ_j \in [θ_A,θ]$. The deviations from its mean, ${\cal N}_{θ_A}(θ) - \mathbb{E}({\cal N}_{θ_A}(θ))$, form a random process as function of $θ$. We study the maximum of this process, by exploiting the mapping onto the statistical mechanics of log-correlated random landscapes. By using an extended Fisher-Hartwig conjecture for Toeplitz determinants, supplemented with the freezing duality conjecture for log-correlated fields, we obtain the cumulants of the distribution of that maximum for any $β>0$. It exhibits combined features of standard counting statistics of fermions (free for $β=2$ and with Sutherland-type interaction for $β\ne 2$) in an interval and extremal statistics of the fractional Brownian motion with Hurst index $H=0$. The $β=2$ results are expected to apply to the statistics of zeroes of the Riemann Zeta function

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.