Paper detail

Statistical signature of vortex filaments: dog or tail? Talk given at QFS 2016

The title of the paper coincides with the title of a paragraph in the famous book by U. Frisch (1995)on classical turbulence. In this paragraph the author discussed the role of statistical dynamics of vortex filaments in the theory of turbulence and put the above question. In other words, whether the main properties of turbulence (cascade, scaling laws) are the sequence of the vortex line dynamics or the latter have only marginal signature. Quantum fluids, where the vortex filaments are the real objects, give an excellent opportunity to explore the role of discrete vortices in turbulent phenomena. The aim of this paper is to discuss which elements of vortex dynamics would lead to the main ingredients of the theory of turbulence. We discuss how the nonlinear dynamics of vortex filaments can result in an exchange of energy between different scales, the formation of the Kolmogorov-type energy spectra and the decay of turbulence.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.