Paper detail

Statistical model for overdispersed count outcome with many zeros: an approach for direct marginal inference

Marginalized models are in great demand by most researchers in the life sciences particularly in clinical trials, epidemiology, health-economics, surveys and many others since they allow generalization of inference to the entire population under study. For count data, standard procedures such as the Poisson regression and negative binomial model provide population average inference for model parameters. However, occurrence of excess zero counts and lack of independence in empirical data have necessitated their extension to accommodate these phenomena. These extensions, though useful, complicates interpretations of effects. For example, the zero-inflated Poisson model accounts for the presence of excess zeros but the parameter estimates do not have a direct marginal inferential ability as its base model, the Poisson model. Marginalizations due to the presence of excess zeros are underdeveloped though demand for such is interestingly high. The aim of this paper is to develop a marginalized model for zero-inflated univariate count outcome in the presence of overdispersion. Emphasis is placed on methodological development, efficient estimation of model parameters, implementation and application to two empirical studies. A simulation study is performed to assess the performance of the model. Results from the analysis of two case studies indicated that the refined procedure performs significantly better than models which do not simultaneously correct for overdispersion and presence of excess zero counts in terms of likelihood comparisons and AIC values. The simulation studies also supported these findings. In addition, the proposed technique yielded small biases and mean square errors for model parameters. To ensure that the proposed method enjoys widespread use, it is implemented using the SAS NLMIXED procedure with minimal coding efforts.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.