Paper detail

Statistical Learning with Conditional Value at Risk

We propose a risk-averse statistical learning framework wherein the performance of a learning algorithm is evaluated by the conditional value-at-risk (CVaR) of losses rather than the expected loss. We devise algorithms based on stochastic gradient descent for this framework. While existing studies of CVaR optimization require direct access to the underlying distribution, our algorithms make a weaker assumption that only i.i.d.\ samples are given. For convex and Lipschitz loss functions, we show that our algorithm has $O(1/\sqrt{n})$-convergence to the optimal CVaR, where $n$ is the number of samples. For nonconvex and smooth loss functions, we show a generalization bound on CVaR. By conducting numerical experiments on various machine learning tasks, we demonstrate that our algorithms effectively minimize CVaR compared with other baseline algorithms.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.