Paper detail

Statistical applications of Random matrix theory: comparison of two populations III

This paper investigates a statistical procedure for testing the equality of two independently estimated covariance matrices when the number of potentially dependent data vectors is large and proportional to the size of the vectors, that is, the number of variables. Inspired by the spike models used in random matrix theory, we concentrate on the largest eigenvalues of the matrices in order to determine significant differences. To avoid false rejections we must guard against residual spikes and need a sufficiently precise description of the properties of the largest eigenvalues under the null hypothesis. In this paper, we extend arXiv:2002.12741 for perturbation of order $1$ and arXiv:2002.12703 studying simpler statistic. The residual spike introduce in the first paper is investigated and leads to a statistic that results in a good test of equality of two populations. Simulations show that this new test does not rely on some hypotheses that were necessary for the proofs and in the second paper.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.