Paper detail

Stationary measure of the driven two-dimensional q-Whittaker particle system on the torus

We consider a q-deformed version of the uniform Gibbs measure on dimers on the periodized hexagonal lattice (equivalently, on interlacing particle configurations, if vertical dimers are seen as particles) and show that it is invariant under a certain irreversible q-Whittaker dynamic. Thereby we provide a new non-trivial example of driven interacting two-dimensional particle system, or of (2+1)-dimensional stochastic growth model, with explicit stationary measure. We emphasize that this measure is far from being a product Bernoulli measure. These Gibbs measures and dynamics both arose earlier in the theory of Macdonald processes. The q=0 degeneration of the Gibbs measures reduce to the usual uniform dimer measures with given tilt, the degeneration of the dynamics originate in the study of Schur processes and the degeneration of the results contained herein were recently treated in work of the second author.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.