Paper detail

Stationary isothermic surfaces in Euclidean 3-space

Let $Ω$ be a domain in $\mathbb R^3$ with $\partialΩ= \partial\left(\mathbb R^3\setminus \overlineΩ\right)$, where $\partialΩ$ is unbounded and connected, and let $u$ be the solution of the Cauchy problem for the heat equation $\partial_t u= Δu$ over $\mathbb R^3,$ where the initial data is the characteristic function of the set $Ω^c = \mathbb R^3\setminus Ω$. We show that, if there exists a stationary isothermic surface $Γ$ of $u$ with $Γ\cap \partialΩ= \varnothing$, then both $\partialΩ$ and $Γ$ must be either parallel planes or co-axial circular cylinders . This theorem completes the classification of stationary isothermic surfaces in the case that $Γ\cap\partialΩ=\varnothing$ and $\partialΩ$ is unbounded. To prove this result, we establish a similar theorem for {\it uniformly dense domains } in $\mathbb R^3$, a notion that was introduced by Magnanini, Prajapat \& Sakaguchi in \cite{MPS2006tams}. In the proof, we use methods from the theory of surfaces with constant mean curvature, combined with a careful analysis of certain asymptotic expansions and a surprising connection with the theory of transnormal functions.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.