Paper detail

Stationarity breaking in coupled physical systems revealed by recurrence analysis

In this letter we explore how recurrence quantifier, the determinism ($Δ$), can reveal stationarity breaking and coupling between physical systems. We demonstrate that it is possible to detect small variations in a dynamical system based only on temporal signal displayed by another system coupled to it. To introduce basic ideas, we consider a well known dynamical system composed of two master-slave coupled Lorenz oscillators. We start evidencing that due to the sensitivity of $Δ$ computed from temporal time series of slave oscillator, its is possible to detect the stationary breaking imposed in the master oscillator. As a second example, the method is carried out in a real physiological data acquired from accelerometer sensors ($\mathrm{A_{cc}}$) and used to detect micro arousal phenomenology (described by a sharp burst in $\mathrm{A_{cc}}$ signal) during sleep periods in mice. Moreover, we show for the first time that making use of recurrence quantifier it is possible to infer a coupling between electric signals from hippocampus and "locomotor brain areas" of mice, based only on non invasive data from $\mathrm{A_{cc}}$. Our results suggest new possibilities of analysis of coupled systems making use of accessible time series. Our second example supports an interpretation of an internal coupling detectable as a stationarity breaking in $\mathrm{A_{cc}}$ that occurs some seconds before micro arousal processes during sleep periods in rodents, contributing to the idea that micro arousals are elements of sleep taking part in the regulation of sleep process. Such a characterization of micro arousals can improve our knowledge about sleep fostering tools of sleep diagnose and pharmacology research for mammals in general.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.