Paper detail

State Variables and Constraints in Thermodynamics of Solids and Their Implications

There is a common view in thermodynamics that the behavior of a macroscopic system can be described by only a few state variables. Although this is true for many cases, it is unclear whether it is meaningful to ask how many state variables are acceptable. This is indeed a problem when solids are investigated within the framework of thermodynamics, which is scarcely discussed in textbooks. The present study gives an answer to this question: the mean values of all the atom positions of a given solid together with the internal energy constitute a commensurate set of state variables (thermodynamic coordinates, TCs). The argument begins with constructing consistent definitions of equilibrium and TCs. TCs are created by the constraints which characterize the system under consideration. The values of TCs are uniquely determined in equilibrium and the mutual relationships between them constitute the fundamental relation of equilibrium (FRE). Specific heat can be deduced from the FRE. Therefore, the TCs of a solid must be to give a full expression of the specific heat in the entire range of temperature, from which the above conclusion is deduced. Contrary to the conventional view, an infinite number of the atom positions and their microscopic characters do not conflict with the principles of thermodynamics. The most important requirement for TCs to meet is the uniqueness of their values in equilibrium against random motions of the constituent particles. This conclusion is compatible with the principle of information theory that the information needed to determine the probability distribution of states is the expectation values of statistical variables. A few working examples of TCs in solids are given.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.