Paper detail

State-space renormalization group theory of nonequilibrium reaction networks: Exact solutions for hypercubic lattices in arbitrary dimensions

Nonequilibrium reaction networks (NRNs) underlie most biological functions. Despite their diverse dynamic properties, NRNs share the signature characteristics of persistent probability fluxes and continuous energy dissipation even in the steady state. Dynamics of NRNs can be described at different coarse-grained levels. Our previous work showed that the apparent energy dissipation rate at a coarse-grained level follows an inverse power law dependence on the scale of coarse-graining. The scaling exponent is determined by the network structure and correlation of stationary probability fluxes. However, it remains unclear whether and how the (renormalized) flux correlation varies with coarse-graining. Following Kadanoff's real space renormalization group (RG) approach for critical phenomena, we address this question by developing a State-Space Renormalization Group (SSRG) theory for NRNs, which leads to an iterative RG equation for the flux correlation function. In square and hypercubic lattices, we solve the RG equation exactly and find two types of fixed point solutions: a family of nontrivial fixed points where the correlation exhibits power-law decay and a trivial fixed point where the correlation vanishes beyond the nearest neighbors. The power-law fixed point is stable if and only if the power exponent is less than the lattice dimension $n$. Consequently, the correlation function converges to the power-law fixed point only when the correlation in the fine-grained network decays slower than $r^{-n}$ and to the trivial fixed point otherwise. If the flux correlation in the fine-grained network contains multiple stable solutions with different exponents, the RG iteration dynamics select the fixed point solution with the smallest exponent. We also discuss a possible connection between the RG flows of flux correlation with those of the Kosterlitz-Thouless transition.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.