Paper detail

Star Cluster Formation and Destruction in the Merging Galaxy NGC 3256

We use the Advanced Camera for Surveys on the Hubble Space Telescope to study the rich population of young massive star clusters in the main body of NGC 3256, a merging pair of galaxies with a high star formation rate (SFR) and SFR per unit area ($Σ_{\rm{SFR}}$). These clusters have luminosity and mass functions that follow power laws, $dN/dL \propto L^α$ with $α= -2.23 \pm 0.07$, and $dN/dM \propto M^β$ with $β= -1.86 \pm 0.34$ for $τ< 10$ Myr clusters, similar to those found in more quiescent galaxies. The age distribution can be described by $dN/dτ\propto τ^ γ$, with $γ\approx -0.67 \pm 0.08$ for clusters younger than about a few hundred million years, with no obvious dependence on cluster mass. This is consistent with a picture where $\sim 80 \%$ of the clusters are disrupted each decade in time. We investigate the claim that galaxies with high $Σ_{\rm{SFR}}$ form clusters more efficiently than quiescent systems by determining the fraction of stars in bound clusters ($Γ$) and the CMF/SFR statistic (CMF is the cluster mass function) for NGC 3256 and comparing the results with those for other galaxies. We find that the CMF/SFR statistic for NGC 3256 agrees well with that found for galaxies with $Σ_{\rm{SFR}}$ and SFRs that are lower by $1-3$ orders of magnitude, but that estimates for $Γ$ are only robust when the same sets of assumptions are applied. Currently, $Γ$ values available in the literature have used different sets of assumptions, making it more difficult to compare the results between galaxies.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.