Source author record

Alexander J. Mulia

Alexander J. Mulia appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

1works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint2016arXiv

Star Cluster Formation and Destruction in the Merging Galaxy NGC 3256

We use the Advanced Camera for Surveys on the Hubble Space Telescope to study the rich population of young massive star clusters in the main body of NGC 3256, a merging pair of galaxies with a high star formation rate (SFR) and SFR per unit area ($Σ_{\rm{SFR}}$). These clusters have luminosity and mass functions that follow power laws, $dN/dL \propto L^α$ with $α= -2.23 \pm 0.07$, and $dN/dM \propto M^β$ with $β= -1.86 \pm 0.34$ for $τ< 10$ Myr clusters, similar to those found in more quiescent galaxies. The age distribution can be described by $dN/dτ\propto τ^ γ$, with $γ\approx -0.67 \pm 0.08$ for clusters younger than about a few hundred million years, with no obvious dependence on cluster mass. This is consistent with a picture where $\sim 80 \%$ of the clusters are disrupted each decade in time. We investigate the claim that galaxies with high $Σ_{\rm{SFR}}$ form clusters more efficiently than quiescent systems by determining the fraction of stars in bound clusters ($Γ$) and the CMF/SFR statistic (CMF is the cluster mass function) for NGC 3256 and comparing the results with those for other galaxies. We find that the CMF/SFR statistic for NGC 3256 agrees well with that found for galaxies with $Σ_{\rm{SFR}}$ and SFRs that are lower by $1-3$ orders of magnitude, but that estimates for $Γ$ are only robust when the same sets of assumptions are applied. Currently, $Γ$ values available in the literature have used different sets of assumptions, making it more difficult to compare the results between galaxies.