Paper detail

Standing waves on a flower graph

A flower graph consists of a half line and $N$ symmetric loops connected at a single vertex with $N \geq 2$ (it is called the tadpole graph if $N = 1$). We consider positive single-lobe states on the flower graph in the framework of the cubic nonlinear Schrodinger equation. The main novelty of our paper is a rigorous application of the period function for second-order differential equations towards understanding the symmetries and bifurcations of standing waves on metric graphs. We show that the positive single-lobe symmetric state (which is the ground state of energy for small fixed mass) undergoes exactly one bifurcation for larger mass, at which point $(N-1)$ branches of other positive single-lobe states appear: each branch has $K$ larger components and $(N-K)$ smaller components, where $1 \leq K \leq N-1$. We show that only the branch with $K = 1$ represents a local minimizer of energy for large fixed mass, however, the ground state of energy is not attained for large fixed mass. Analytical results obtained from the period function are illustrated numerically.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.