Paper detail

Stability of exact solutions of the $(2+1)$-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with arbitrary nonlinearity parameter $κ$

In this work, we consider the nonlinear Schrödinger equation (NLSE) in $2+1$ dimensions with arbitrary nonlinearity exponent $κ$ in the presence of an external confining potential. Exact solutions to the system are constructed, and their stability over their "mass" (i.e., the $L^2$ norm) and the parameter $κ$ is explored. We observe both theoretically and numerically that the presence of the confining potential leads to wider domains of stability over the parameter space compared to the unconfined case. Our analysis suggests the existence of a stable regime of solutions for all $κ$ as long as their mass is less than a critical value $M^{\ast}(κ)$. Furthermore, we find that there are two different critical masses, one corresponding to width perturbations and the other one to translational perturbations. The results of Derrick's theorem are also obtained by studying the small amplitude regime of a four-parameter collective coordinate (4CC) approximation. A numerical stability analysis of the NLSE shows that the instability curve $M^{\ast}(κ)$ vs. $κ$ lies below the two curves found by Derrick's theorem and the 4CC approximation. In the absence of the external potential, $κ=1$ demarcates the separation between the blowup regime and the stable regime. In this 4CC approximation, for $κ<1$, when the mass is above the critical mass for the translational instability, quite complicated motions of the collective coordinates are possible. Energy conservation prevents the blowup of the solution as well as confines the center of the solution to a finite spatial domain. We call this regime the "frustrated" blowup regime and give some illustrations. In an appendix, we show how to extend these results to arbitrary initial ground state solution data and arbitrary spatial dimension $d$.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.