Paper detail

Stability in the Busemann-Petty and Shephard problems

A comparison problem for volumes of convex bodies asks whether inequalities $f_K(ξ)\le f_L(ξ)$ for all $ξ\in S^{n-1}$ imply that $\vol_n(K)\le \vol_n(L),$ where $K,L$ are convex bodies in $\R^n,$ and $f_K$ is a certain geometric characteristic of $K.$ By linear stability in comparison problems we mean that there exists a constant $c$ such that for every $\e>0$, the inequalities $f_K(ξ)\le f_L(ξ)+\e$ for all $ξ\in S^{n-1}$ imply that $(\vol_n(K))^{\frac{n-1}n}\le (\vol_n(L))^{\frac{n-1}n}+c\e.$ We prove such results in the settings of the Busemann-Petty and Shephard problems and their generalizations. We consider the section function $f_K(ξ)=S_K(ξ)=\vol_{n-1}(K\cap ξ^\bot)$ and the projection function $f_K(ξ)=P_K(ξ)=\vol_{n-1}(K|ξ^\bot),$ where $ξ^\perp$ is the central hyperplane perpendicular to $ξ,$ and $K|ξ^\bot$ is the orthogonal projection of $K$ to $ξ^\bot.$ In these two cases we prove linear stability under additional conditions that $K$ is an intersection body or $L$ is a projection body, respectively. Then we consider other functions $f_K,$ which allows to remove the additional conditions on the bodies in higher dimensions.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.