Paper detail

Stability Approach to Regularization Selection for Reduced-Rank Regression

The reduced-rank regression model is a popular model to deal with multivariate response and multiple predictors, and is widely used in biology, chemometrics, econometrics, engineering, and other fields. In the reduced-rank regression modelling, a central objective is to estimate the rank of the coefficient matrix that represents the number of effective latent factors in predicting the multivariate response. Although theoretical results such as rank estimation consistency have been established for various methods, in practice rank determination still relies on information criterion based methods such as AIC and BIC or subsampling based methods such as cross validation. Unfortunately, the theoretical properties of these practical methods are largely unknown. In this paper, we present a novel method called StARS-RRR that selects the tuning parameter and then estimates the rank of the coefficient matrix for reduced-rank regression based on the stability approach. We prove that StARS-RRR achieves rank estimation consistency, i.e., the rank estimated with the tuning parameter selected by StARS-RRR is consistent to the true rank. Through a simulation study, we show that StARS-RRR outperforms other tuning parameter selection methods including AIC, BIC, and cross validation as it provides the most accurate estimated rank. In addition, when applied to a breast cancer dataset, StARS-RRR discovers a reasonable number of genetic pathways that affect the DNA copy number variations and results in a smaller prediction error than the other methods with a random-splitting process.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.