Paper detail

Stability and slicing inequalities for intersection bodies

We prove a generalization of the hyperplane inequality for intersection bodies, where volume is replaced by an arbitrary measure $μ$ with even continuous density and sections are of arbitrary dimension $n-k,\ 1\le k <n.$ If $K$ is a generalized $k$-intersection body, then $$μ(K)\,\leq\,\frac{n}{n-k}c_{n,k}\max_{H} μ(K\cap H) \vol_n(K)^{k/n}.$$ Here $c_{n,k} = |B_2^n|^{(n-k)/n}/|B_2^{n-k}|<1,$ $|B_2^n|$ is the volume of the unit Euclidean ball, and maximum is taken over all $(n-k)$-dimensional subspaces of $\R^n.$ The constant is optimal, and for each intersection body the inequality holds for every $k.$ We also prove a stronger "difference" inequality. The proof is based on stability in the lower dimensional Busemann-Petty problem for arbitrary measures in the following sense. Let $\e>0,\ 1\le k <n.$ Suppose that $K$ and $L$ are origin-symmetric star bodies in $\R^n,$ and $K$ is a generalized $k$-intersection body. If for every $(n-k)$-dimensional subspace $H$ of $\R^n$ $$μ(K\cap H)\leq μ(L\cap H)+\e,$$ then $$μ(K)\leq μ(L) +\frac{n}{n-k}c_{n,k} \vol_n(K)^{k/n}\e.$$

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.