Paper detail

Stability and error estimates of a general modified quasi-boundary value method via a semi-linear backward parabolic equation

Regularization methods have been recently developed to construct stable approximate solutions to classical partial differential equations considered as final value problems. In this paper, we investigate the backward parabolic problem with locally Lipschitz source: $\partial_{t}u+μ\left(t\right)\mathcal{A}u\left(t\right)=f\left(t,u\right)$ where $\mathcal{A}:\mathcal{D}\left(\mathcal{A}\right)\subset\mathcal{H}\to\mathcal{H}$ is a positive, self-adjoint and unbounded linear operator on the Hilbert space $\mathcal{H}$. The problem arises in many applications, but it is in general ill-posed. The ill-posedness is caused by catastrophic growth in the representation of solution, then independence of solution on data makes computational procedures impossible. Therefore, we contribute to this interesting field the study of the stable approximation solution via the modified quasi-boundary value method based on nonlinear spectral theory, which slightly extends the results in many works. Our main focus is to qualitatively prove the stability and convergence rate where semi-group technicalities are highly useful.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.