Paper detail

Split HMC for Gaussian Process Models

In this paper, we discuss an extension of the Split Hamiltonian Monte Carlo (Split HMC) method for Gaussian process model (GPM). This method is based on splitting the Hamiltonian in a way that allows much of the movement around the state space to be done at low computational cost. To this end, we approximate the negative log density (i.e., the energy function) of the distribution of interest by a quadratic function U0 for which Hamiltonian dynamics can be solved analytically. The overall energy function U is then written as U0 + U1, where U1 is the approximation error. The Hamiltonian is then split into two parts; one part is based on U0 is handled analytically, the other part is based on U1 for which we approximate Hamiltonian's equations by discretizing time. We use simulated and real data to compare the performance of our method to the standard HMC. We find that splitting the Hamiltonian for GP models could lead to substantial improvement (up to 10 folds) of sampling efficiency, which is measured in terms of the amount of time required for producing an independent sample with high acceptance probability from posterior distributions.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.