Paper detail

Spin-lattice relaxation in bismuth chalcogenides

Bismuth chalcogenides Bi$_2$Se$_3$ and Bi$_2$Te$_3$ are semiconductors, which can be both thermoelectric materials (TE) and topological insulators (TI). Lattice defects arising from vacancies, impurities, or dopants in these materials are important in that they provide the charge carriers in TE applications and compromise the performance of these materials as TIs. We present the first solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) study of the $^{77}$Se and $^{125}$Te NMR resonances in polycrystalline powders of Bi$_2$Se$_3$ and Bi$_2$Te$_3$, respectively. The spin-lattice ($T_1$) relaxation is modeled by at most two exponentials. Within the framework of this model, the NMR measurement is sensitive to the distribution of native defects within these materials. One component corresponds to a stoichiometric fraction, an insulator with a very long $T_1$, whereas the other component is attributed to a sample fraction with high defect content with a short $T_1$ resulting from interaction with the conduction carriers. The absence of a very long $T_1$ in the bismuth telluride suggests defects throughout the sample. For the bismuth selenide, defect regions segregate into domains. We also find a substantial difference in the short $T_1$ component for $^{125}$Te nuclei (76 ms) and $^{77}$Se (0.63 s) in spite of the fact that these materials have nearly identical lattice structures, chemical and physical properties. Investigations of the NMR shift and Korringa law indicate that the coupling to the conduction band electrons at the chalcogenide sites is much stronger in the telluride. The results are consistent with a stronger spin-orbit coupling (SOC) to the $p$-band electrons in the telluride. If most parameters of a given material are kept equal, this type of experiment could provide a useful probe of SOC in engineered TI materials.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.