Paper detail

Spin-gapped magnets with weak anisotropies I: Constraints on the phase of the condensate wave function

We study the thermodynamic properties of dimerized spin-gapped quantum magnets with and without exchange anisotropy (EA) and Dzyaloshinsky and Moriya (DM) anisotropies within the mean-field approximation (MFA). For this purpose we obtain the thermodynamic potential $Ω$ of a triplon gas taking into account the strength of DM interaction up to second order. The minimization of $Ω$ with respect to self-energies $Σ_n$ and $Σ_{an}$ yields the equation for $X_{1,2}=Σ_n\pmΣ_{an}-μ$, which define the dispersion of quasiparticles $E_k=\sqrt{ε_k+X_1}\sqrt{ε_k+X_2}$ where $ε_k$ is the bare dispersion of triplons. The minimization of $Ω$ with respect to the magnitude $ρ_0$ and the phase $Θ$ of triplon condensate leads to coupled equations for $ρ_0$ and $Θ$. We discuss the restrictions on $ρ_0$ and $Θ$ imposed by these equations for systems with and without anisotropy. The requirement of dynamical stability conditions $(X_1>0, X_2>0)$ in equilibrium, as well as the Hugenholtz-Pines theorem, particularly for isotropic Bose condensate, impose certain conditions to the physical solutions of these equations. It is shown that the phase angle of a purely homogenous Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) without any anisotropy may only take values $Θ=πn $ (n=0,$\pm 1,\pm 2$...) while that of BEC with even a tiny DM interaction results in $Θ=π/2+2πn$. In contrast to the widely used Hartree-Fock-Popov approximation, which allows arbitrary phase angle, our approach predicts that the phase angle may have only discrete values, while the phase of the wave function of the whole system remains arbitrary as expected. The consequences of this phase locking for interference of two Bose condensates and to their possible Josephson junction is studied.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.