Paper detail

Spike and Slab Gaussian Process Latent Variable Models

The Gaussian process latent variable model (GP-LVM) is a popular approach to non-linear probabilistic dimensionality reduction. One design choice for the model is the number of latent variables. We present a spike and slab prior for the GP-LVM and propose an efficient variational inference procedure that gives a lower bound of the log marginal likelihood. The new model provides a more principled approach for selecting latent dimensions than the standard way of thresholding the length-scale parameters. The effectiveness of our approach is demonstrated through experiments on real and simulated data. Further, we extend multi-view Gaussian processes that rely on sharing latent dimensions (known as manifold relevance determination) with spike and slab priors. This allows a more principled approach for selecting a subset of the latent space for each view of data. The extended model outperforms the previous state-of-the-art when applied to a cross-modal multimedia retrieval task.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.