Paper detail

Spherical tilings by congruent quadrangles over pseudo-double wheels (III) - the essential uniqueness in case of convex tiles

In [B.Gruenbaum, G.C. Shephard, Spherical tilings with transitivity properties, in: The geometric vein, Springer, New York, 1981, pp. 65-98], they proved "for every spherical normal tiling by congruent tiles, if it is isohedral, then the graph is a Platonic solid, an Archimedean dual, an n-gonal bipyramid (n>2), or an n-gonal trapezohedron (i.e., the pseudo-double wheel of 2n faces)". In the classification of spherical monohedral tilings, one naturally asks an "inverse problem" of their result: For a spherical monohedral tiling of the above mentioned topologies, when is the tiling isohedral? We prove that for any spherical monohedral quadrangular tiling being topologically a trapezohedron, if the number of faces is 6, or 8, if the tile is a kite, a dart or a rhombi, or if the tile is convex, then the tiling is isohedral.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.