Paper detail

Spectral properties of the two-impurity Anderson model with varying distance and various interactions

We present a novel approximation for two interacting magnetic impurities immersed into a noninteracting metallic host. The scheme is based on direct perturbation theory in the hybridization between the impurity and band electrons. This two-impurity enhanced noncrossing approximation (TIE) fully incorporates the indirect interaction between the impurities which are mediated by the conduction electrons as well as additional arbitrary direct interaction matrix elements. We qualify the approximation by investigating the uncoupled case and conclude the TIE to be equally accurate as its single impurity counterpart. The physical properties of the two-impurity Anderson model are first investigated in some limiting cases. In a regime, where each of the uncoupled two impurities would exhibit a pronounced Kondo effect, we ignore the indirect coupling via the conduction band and only incorporate direct interactions. For a ferromagnetic direct exchange coupling, the system displays a behavior similar to a spin-one Kondo effect, while an antiferromagnetic coupling competes with the Kondo effect and produces a pseudogap in the many-body Kondo resonance of the single-particle spectral function. Interestingly, a direct one-particle hopping also produces a pseudogap but additionally pronounced side-peaks emerge. This gap is characteristically different from the case with antiferromagnetic coupling, since it emerges as a consequence of distinct Kondo effects for the bonding and anti-bonding orbital, i.e.\ it reflects a splitting of even and odd parity states.For the general case of only indirect coupling the results show signatures of all the previously discussed limiting cases as function of the impurity-impurity distance. We are led to the conclusion that the well known Doniach-scenario captures essential aspects this model, but the details especially at small distances are more complicated.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.