Paper detail

Spectral properties of some unions of linear spaces

We consider \textit{additive spaces}, consisting of two intervals of unit length or two general probability measures on ${\mathbb R}^1$, positioned on the axes in ${\mathbb R}^2$, with a natural additive measure $ρ$. We study the relationship between the exponential frames, Riesz bases, and orthonormal bases of $L^2(ρ)$ and those of its component spaces. We find that the existence of exponential bases depends strongly on how we position our measures on ${\mathbb R}^1$. We show that non-overlapping additive spaces possess Riesz bases, and we give a necessary condition for overlapping spaces. We also show that some overlapping additive spaces of Lebesgue type have exponential orthonormal bases, while some do not. A particular example is the "L" shape at the origin, which has a unique orthonormal basis up to translations of the form \[ \left\{e^{2 πi (λ_1 x_1 + λ_2 x_2)} : (λ_1, λ_2) \in Λ\right\}, \] where \[ Λ= \{ (n/2, -n/2) \mid n \in {\mathbb Z} \}. \]

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.