Paper detail

Spectral condition, hitting times and Nash inequality

Let $X$ be a $μ$-symmetric Hunt process on a LCCB space E. For an open set G $\subseteq$ E, let $τ_G$ be the exit time of $X$ from G and $A^G$ be the generator of the process killed when it leaves G. Let $r:[0,\infty[\to[0,\infty[$ and $R (t) = \int_0^t r(s) ds$. We give necessary and sufficient conditions for $\E_μ R (τ_G)<\infty$ in terms of the behavior near the origin of the spectral measure of $-A^G.$ When $r(t)=t^l$, $l>0$, by means of this condition we derive the Nash inequality for the killed process. In the case of one-dimensional diffusions, this permits to show that the existence of moments of order $l$ for $τ_G$ implies the Nash inequality of order $p=\frac{l+2}{l+1}$ for the whole process. The associated rate of convergence of the semi-group in $L^2(μ)$ is bounded by $t^{-(l+1)}$. For diffusions in dimension greater than one, we obtain the Nash inequality of the same order under an additional non-degeneracy condition (local Poincaré inequality). Finally, we show for general Hunt processes that the Nash inequality giving rise to a convergence rate of order $t^{-(l+1)}$ of the semi-group, implies the existence of moments of order $l+1 -ε$ for $τ_G$, for all $ ε>0$.

preprint2012arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.