Paper detail

Sparse Representations of Positive Functions via First and Second-Order Pseudo-Mirror Descent

We consider expected risk minimization problems when the range of the estimator is required to be nonnegative, motivated by the settings of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) and trajectory optimization. To facilitate nonlinear interpolation, we hypothesize that the search space is a Reproducing Kernel Hilbert Space (RKHS). We develop first and second-order variants of stochastic mirror descent employing (i) \emph{pseudo-gradients} and (ii) complexity-reducing projections. Compressive projection in the first-order scheme is executed via kernel orthogonal matching pursuit (KOMP), which overcomes the fact that the vanilla RKHS parameterization grows unbounded with the iteration index in the stochastic setting. Moreover, pseudo-gradients are needed when gradient estimates for cost are only computable up to some numerical error, which arise in, e.g., integral approximations. Under constant step-size and compression budget, we establish tradeoffs between the radius of convergence of the expected sub-optimality and the projection budget parameter, as well as non-asymptotic bounds on the model complexity. To refine the solution's precision, we develop a second-order extension which employs recursively averaged pseudo-gradient outer-products to approximate the Hessian inverse, whose convergence in mean is established under an additional eigenvalue decay condition on the Hessian of the optimal RKHS element, which is unique to this work. Experiments demonstrate favorable performance on inhomogeneous Poisson Process intensity estimation in practice.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.