Paper detail

Spark Parameter Tuning via Trial-and-Error

Spark has been established as an attractive platform for big data analysis, since it manages to hide most of the complexities related to parallelism, fault tolerance and cluster setting from developers. However, this comes at the expense of having over 150 configurable parameters, the impact of which cannot be exhaustively examined due to the exponential amount of their combinations. The default values allow developers to quickly deploy their applications but leave the question as to whether performance can be improved open. In this work, we investigate the impact of the most important of the tunable Spark parameters on the application performance and guide developers on how to proceed to changes to the default values. We conduct a series of experiments with known benchmarks on the MareNostrum petascale supercomputer to test the performance sensitivity. More importantly, we offer a trial-and-error methodology for tuning parameters in arbitrary applications based on evidence from a very small number of experimental runs. We test our methodology in three case studies, where we manage to achieve speedups of more than 10 times.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.