Paper detail

Spark Level Sparsity and the $\ell_1$ Tail Minimization

Solving compressed sensing problems relies on the properties of sparse signals. It is commonly assumed that the sparsity s needs to be less than one half of the spark of the sensing matrix A, and then the unique sparsest solution exists, and recoverable by $\ell_1$-minimization or related procedures. We discover, however, a measure theoretical uniqueness exists for nearly spark-level sparsity from compressed measurements Ax = b. Specifically, suppose A is of full spark with m rows, and suppose $\frac{m}{2}$ < s < m. Then the solution to Ax = b is unique for x with $\|x\|_0 \leq s$ up to a set of measure 0 in every s-sparse plane. This phenomenon is observed and confirmed by an $\ell_1$-tail minimization procedure, which recovers sparse signals uniquely with s > $\frac{m}{2}$ in thousands and thousands of random tests. We further show instead that the mere $\ell_1$-minimization would actually fail if s > $\frac{m}{2}$ even from the same measure theoretical point of view.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.