Paper detail

Spanning connectivity in a multilayer network and its relationship to site-bond percolation

We analyze the connectivity of an $M$-layer network over a common set of nodes that are active only in a fraction of the layers. Each layer is assumed to be a subgraph (of an underlying connectivity graph $G$) induced by each node being active in any given layer with probability $q$. The $M$-layer network is formed by aggregating the edges over all $M$ layers. We show that when $q$ exceeds a threshold $q_c(M)$, a giant connected component appears in the $M$-layer network---thereby enabling far-away users to connect using `bridge' nodes that are active in multiple network layers---even though the individual layers may only have small disconnected islands of connectivity. We show that $q_c(M) \lesssim \sqrt{-\ln(1-p_c)}\,/{\sqrt{M}}$, where $p_c$ is the bond percolation threshold of $G$, and $q_c(1) \equiv q_c$ is its site percolation threshold. We find $q_c(M)$ exactly for when $G$ is a large random network with an arbitrary node-degree distribution. We find $q_c(M)$ numerically for various regular lattices, and find an exact lower bound for the kagome lattice. Finally, we find an intriguingly close connection between this multilayer percolation model and the well-studied problem of site-bond percolation, in the sense that both models provide a smooth transition between the traditional site and bond percolation models. Using this connection, we translate known analytical approximations of the site-bond critical region, which are functions only of $p_c$ and $q_c$ of the respective lattice, to excellent general approximations of the multilayer connectivity threshold $q_c(M)$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.